Intake and admissions workflow
Inquiry to placement as an owned sequence: capture, first contact, VOB and clinical review, bed allocation, and a recorded outcome.
Solvhaus designs and implements the connected system behavioral health operators run on: intake and admissions, CRM and referral relationships, operational data, automation, and leadership reporting, with BedFlow, Afterflow, and Roll Call placed where they fit.
Solvhaus architects and implements behavioral health operations software for treatment programs: admissions and intake workflow, referral CRM, census and authorization data, automation, and leadership reporting connected into one operating layer. Instead of buying five tools that never agree, you get a documented architecture your admissions, business-development, and executive teams can run daily.
Most treatment operators do not have a demand problem first. They have a systems problem that looks like a demand problem. Referrals arrive in inboxes. Admissions live on a whiteboard. Authorizations live in a spreadsheet. Census is reconstructed every morning. BD activity lives in someone's phone. Every layer works in isolation, so every new opportunity adds strain instead of momentum.
The layers below are designed together so intake, CRM, operational data, automation, and reporting read from the same records. Product tools are placed inside the layer they serve, they are not the architecture on their own.
Five connected layers: intake and admissions, CRM and referral relationships, operational data (census, authorization, alumni), leadership reporting, and the product tools that sit inside those layers.
Capture, first contact, VOB, clinical review, and placement, every stage owned.
Partner accounts, contacts, opportunities, and the admissions pipeline in one data model.
Census, authorizations, alumni contact, and house operations kept current by the people doing the work.
Routing, reminders, and refreshes on top of clean records, with a person on every decision.
Pipeline, source, census, and follow-up views that read from the same records across locations.
Every layer is designed per operator. Product tools are optional and are placed only where the architecture calls for them.
Eight common exceptions, two models. In one, every edge ends at the founder. In the other, ownership rules on the record decide who acts.
Six roles arranged around a center node for the founder. Eight common exceptions are drawn as edges. In "founder as the system" every edge points to the center, so the founder handles 8 exception types. In "owners on the record" each exception routes to the role that owns it and the center carries none.
Growth stalls at one person's memory. Adding a location doubles the edges into the center.
| Exception | Raised by | Handled by |
|---|---|---|
| Inquiry with no owner | BD | Founder |
| Partner never heard back | Admissions | Founder |
| Auth date at risk | Admissions | Founder |
| Bed promised twice | House manager | Founder |
| Missed alumni check-in | Alumni | Founder |
| Three versions of the week | Leadership | Founder |
| House census stale | House manager | Founder |
| Step-down handoff | Alumni | Founder |
Conceptual diagram, not activity data. It shows the shape of the two operating models: one where every exception is a text to the owner, and one where ownership rules on the record decide who acts.
Inquiry to placement as an owned sequence: capture, first contact, VOB and clinical review, bed allocation, and a recorded outcome.
Partner accounts, contacts, opportunities, and pipeline stages modelled on how treatment BD and admissions actually work.
Census, authorizations, alumni contact, and house operations defined once, owned by role, and kept current by the people doing the work.
Source-to-outcome, stage aging, census across programs, and ownership, read from working records, not a Friday export.
Routing, reminders, and refreshes on top of clean records. A person still owns every decision that touches a family.
BedFlow for referral, bed, and census operations. Afterflow for post-discharge. Roll Call for recovery housing. Used only where they fit the model.
The same pipeline, census, and source views across programs, so leadership is not reconciling five versions of the truth.
Documentation, training by role, and the weekly cadence that keeps the system honest after we leave the room.
Referral management for behavioral health: the five-stage workflow and where it breaks.
The data model the whole system reads from.
Referral partner CRM, bed availability, and census inside the architecture.
How operators wire acquisition into admissions data instead of dashboards.
A systems conversation is a working discussion with someone who owns admissions, operations, or growth. Bring the messy version.